TEA: Industrial Services Consolidator - Integration Complexity Meets Margin Reality
HOLD rating with $3.81 fair value vs $4.21 current price. Strong growth prospects offset by integration risks and margin compression pressures.
View noteHOLD rating with $3.81 fair value vs $4.21 current price. Strong growth prospects offset by integration risks and margin compression pressures.
View noteHOLD rating with $11.59 fair value vs $14.00 current price. Strong infrastructure franchise but elevated leverage and regulatory risks limit upside potential.
View noteSuper Retail Group trades at $16.21 vs fair value $13.56, facing digital disruption and margin pressure across four-brand specialty retail portfolio with 55% thesis failure probability.
View noteHOLD rating with $1.78 fair value vs $1.99 current price. Strong 80% annuity model offset by margin compression risks and 53% valuation premium to peers.
View noteMedical device manufacturer with 35-40% oral appliance market share. Fair value $0.30 vs current $0.70. EBITDA margins compressing, manufacturing constraints binding.
View noteElectrical contractor riding data centre wave faces inevitable margin compression. Fair value $1.55 vs current $2.97. EBITDA margins 9.0%, ROIC 84%, but competition emerging.
View noteSHAPE trades at $4.28 vs fair value $3.30. Strong operations (86% Perfect Delivery, 78.6% ROIC) but execution complexity and cycle timing create unfavourable risk-reward.
View noteMid-tier polymetallic miner with 45% EBITDA margins trading at $15.43 vs $3.82 fair value. Strong operations, challenging valuation at commodity cycle peak.
View noteHOLD rating with $23.21 fair value vs $25.16 current price. Platform Unification complete, targeting 46% EBITDA margins through operational leverage amid employment recovery.
View noteSiteMinder trades at $7.50 versus $3.68 fair value (51% overvaluation). Strong platform business with 7.4/10 quality score but execution risk limits appeal at current levels.
View noteRisk-adjusted fair value A$0.28 vs current A$0.35. Binary expansion project dependency with 30% failure probability creating -66% downside risk.
View noteResolute Mining analysis reveals 42% overvaluation at $0.72 vs $0.28 fair value, with execution risks and unsustainable gold margins creating asymmetric downside.
View note